Drug Testing: Coal Miner Unions, Owners Balk at Proposed Federal …

During a Tuesday hearing on its proposed drug testing rule covering greater amount of than 116,000 coal miners, the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MHSA) got it from both sides, with mine workers criticizing the proposed rule as unnecessary and mine owners criticizing it for not being tough plenty.

Out of a US ministry industry (including oil and gas extraction) of greater quantity than 300,000 workers, nearly two-thirds are already subject to drug testing, mostly out of agreements negotiated between employers and unions. Federal enactment currently mandates drug testing for public safety (truck drivers, train engineers) and national security reasons. It does not mandate it for “risky” occupations.

The MHSA proposed rule would bar the use or possession of drugs or alcohol at coal and other mineral mines, would require pre-employment drug testing, and would mandate stray suspicionless drug testing of workers. Workers who test positive would have to clean deaden with narcotics treatment before being allowed back on the piece of work. Companies that don’t already have mix with drugs testing programs in place would have one year to comply with the new rule. MHSA estimates the prescription would cost the industry $16 billion the first year and $13 billion a year after that.

According to MHSA, drug and alcohol use in the mines is “a risk to miner safety” and “because mining is inherently dangerous, MHSA is proposing a standard to imploration this risk.” But the proposed rule admittedly contains little in greater numbers than anecdotal evidence, newspaper stories, and recitations of general substance abuse estimates to make its case that drug and alcohol abuse is a serious problem in the mines or that drug testing is the best way to address it.”

The mines are currently governed by each MHSA regulation that already prohibits the application or possession of alcohol or drugs at the work site and says succinctly that intoxicated workers are not permitted on the job. During the 30 years they be obliged been in condition, some 270 miners have been cited according to violating that regulation — not a high number in an industry of 300,000 workers — or fewer than 10 a year. And only 10% of those came from subsurface mines.

The lack of strong testimony showing that drug testing is required in the coal mines was a stage United Steelworkers official Mike Wright hit on as he told MHSA reps at Tuesday’s hearing why his union opposed the proposed new aphorism. “MSHA has not shown that the proposed conduct is necessary,” he said. “In this prevail, MSHA is relying on limited anecdotal and sometimes irrelevant information.”

Wright furthermore told the MHSA reps their proposed rules were unconstitutional. With federally-mandated drug testing limited to public safety and national security-related occupations, he said, MHSA had demonstrated nay such fasten. “This proposal is unconstitutional and unnecessary. It’s a distraction from real worker safety and it should have being withdrawn,” Wright said.

The United Mine Workers also called on MHSA to drop the proposed rule, and in the way that did the National Mining Association, the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association, the West Virginia Coal Association and major coal producers Arch Coal and Consol Energy. But unlike the unions, the industry wanted not less if it were not that more drug testing and fewer restrictions on its ability to fire workers who test positive. The industry called for rules that allow them to test hair, saliva, and blood for drugs, more than limiting testing to animal-water samples, as the MHSA proposed prevail on does.

Now, after reviewing public comments on the new rule and listening to the sole general body of mankind hearing it held on the proposed rules, MHSA command take several months to publish its final rule. Coal miners who resembling to smoke a joint while watching the Mountaineers on Saturday afternoons better be on the alert.

This blog found on keywords:

• positive mamp drug screen test
• over the counter meds that may cause false positive results in urine drug screens
• over the counter meds that may cause false positive results in urine drug screens
• teaching positions james city county va area
• ethics+pre-hire+honesty+testing+2008
• what is included in a 6633n sap 10-50 gc/ms

Posted by admin October 2008

Post A Comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website